Source-linked, independently graded research

So — who pays for AI?

Sometimes you. Less often than the headlines say. AI data centers compete for power, chips, equipment, and money — this site grades where that competition is real, where it’s shared with other demand, and where AI is just getting the blame.

Every claim gets a ruling on the first line — true, false, or unproven — plus an attribution grade, the sources and a check date. 4 of 5 are settled outright.

Claim report cards

The claims people actually repeat — ruled on

All report cards →

Prices in the markets AI buys from are rising about 10% faster than in comparable markets it doesn’t.

The index compares AI-exposed input markets to a matched core-PPI control, baselined at 100 in January 2024.

See the score, basket and calculation rules →
Storage-device PPI+30.4%
Since Jan 2024 · not seasonally adjusted
Transformer PPI+5.9%
Since first current-series observation, Oct 2024
Semiconductor PPI−6.3%
Since Jan 2024 · aggregate series, not memory-specific

Note the outlier: semiconductors broadly are cheaper than in January 2024. The squeeze is specific — memory, storage, and grid equipment — not “chips” in general.

Transformer lead time1–2+ yr

DOE’s 2024 distribution-transformer range; large units can reach 3–4 years.

Equipment ledger →
HBM capacity trade3:1

Micron’s reported HBM-to-DDR5 production trade ratio.

Memory ledger →
Gas turbine orders100 GW

GE Vernova backlog plus slot reservations at Q1 2026.

Turbine ledger →

Latest resource grades

Markets with the clearest signal

All 10 markets →

How a grade is made

The same four checks for every grade

  1. 1
    Write down the claim

    Use the wording people actually repeat.

  2. 2
    Trace how it would happen

    Identify the market, the other buyers and the supply limit.

  3. 3
    Check the best sources

    Start with public data, agency work and company filings.

  4. 4
    Review it by hand

    Tools draft updates. The editor approves every publication.

Public changelog

Every revision gets a date

Grade changes, source swaps, and corrections — including ones that don’t change the conclusion — go into one public record.

Read the changelog →

About this project

Pro-growth, and honest about the bill.

David Veksler is a working AI architect who thinks the buildout is worth it — which is exactly why the accounting should be straight. Software flags new data and drafts updates; David reviews every publication. No ads, sponsors, or affiliate links. Affiliations and the capital-markets conflict are disclosed. About & disclosures →